Past Results
Due to confidential settlement agreements and privacy acts, the names of some of the parties to the following cases have been withheld.
$300,000 Recovery: Intentional Interference with an Expected Inheritance; Plaintiff was major beneficiary of decedent's Will & Trust. Prior to decedent's death from terminal lung cancer, decedent's ex-wife re-entered his life and as a result of her undue influence and duress was able to procure an amendment to the Trust whereby the plaintiff's inheritance was greatly devalued. IN RE THE ESTATE OF JOHN DOE; JANE DOE v. MRS. JOHN DOE
$200,000 Recovery: Intentional Interference with an Expected Inheritance; Plaintiffs were grandchildren of decedent; Prior to decedent's death she was in the care of a daughter and named beneficiary. Her daughter used undue influence and through duress forced the decedent to alter her will naming the daughter the sole beneficiary. IN THE ESTATE OF JANE DOE; JANE DOE'S GRANDCHILDREN v. JANE DOE'S DAUGHTER.
$175,000 Recovery: Intentional Interference with an Expected Inheritance; Plaintiffs were named sole beneficiaries under decedent's trust for many years. Prior to decedent's death, she was in the care of family members who practiced undue influence upon her and by duress procured a trust amendment whereby the plaintiffs' inheritance was devalued. WHALEN v. PROSSER; In Re The Estate of Alicia Hall.
$150,000 Recovery: Intentional Interference with an Expected Inheritance; Plaintiffs were relatives of the decedent and were told by the decedent that they would be included in his Will & Testament. Prior to decedent's death he was in the care of professional care givers that used their undue influence to force the decedent under duress to alter his Will to remove his family members and include the care givers. IN THE ESTATE OF JOHN DOE; FAMILY OF JOHN DOE v. CARE GIVERS OF JOHN DOE.
